Friday, March 12, 2010

Arty Farty Friday ~ C.M. ("Cash") Coolidge

Cassius Marcellus Coolidge ("Cash" for short) - you might not recognise the name, but I'll bet you've seen at least one of his paintings and seen or read about one of his innovations.





Coolidge was born to Quaker parents, staunch abolitionists, somewhere between Antwerp and Philadelphia in New York state, on 18 September 1844. At that time Uranus was in Aries, by the way - transiting the area it's about to trundle through again for the next seven years.

This guy (self-portrait, left) was jaw-droppingly versatile. His resume includes: founding a bank, founding and running drug stores, founding a newspaper, painting signs, helping on his parents' farm, became Town Clerk, involved with Masonic Temple, received a patent for a device to collect fares from street cars.....and then there was painting.....

He started sketching in childhood, took a few formal art lessons later on, drew cartoons for local newspapers and had established a reputation locally before his doggy paintings were commissioned. He earned money as a "lightning cartoonist", which involved making quick sketches of people in front of a paying audience. Cash also illustrated several books.

His dog paintings date from the turn of the century. Mainly purchased by cigar companies and used as advertisements and freebies. Brown & Bigelow, an advertising firm, commissioned a series of dog paintings for use on calendars and memorabilia. Coolidge eventually painted 16 versions of dogs getting up to humanistic (predominantly male) pastimes: poker, pool, racing etc.

Yet another of Coolidge's brainwaves resulted in a patented invention he called Comic Foregrounds. These things are now classed as antiques, I guess, but I do remember them in fairgrounds when I was a small child. Life-sized portraits with holes where the head should be. Customers put their heads through the hole and are transformed, for a photograph, into a strong man, beautiful woman, or part of a fantasy scene. Coolidge made hundreds of different paintings for these foregrounds, started a mail order business selling them and provided income for his later life.

As if that's not enough diversity - there's more! He planned and wrote an opera titled King Gallinipper, its theme: eliminating a mosquito epidemic (New York and New Jersey were experiencing one at the time.) He designed costumes and scenery too. The opera was produced and staged. He wrote two other comedies, A Western Heiress and Le Moustique in 1885, possibly never produced on stage.

Cassius was a bachelor until age sixty-four. He married Gertrude Kimmell (29), in 1909. Quite honestly, could he possibly have found time for love in his younger years considering his career history? He died, aged 89, in 1934.



With that much versatility, I'd expect a good spread of planets around Coolidge's natal chart (no bundles or emphasis on just one or two signs), some clear input from Aquarius and Uranus (mental energy, innovation), as well as the usual Venus and Neptune creativity being strongly represented.

Time of birth isn't available, so rising sign can't be calculated. Moon, though, would have been in Sagittarius (sign ruled by Jupiter) somewhere between 10 and 24 degrees, and more likely than not was in harmonious sextile to creative Neptune in quirky Aquarius.

There is a reasonably good spread of planets. Sun and Mars are in Virgo - often said to be the sign of the workaholic. It would seem that Coolidge was, indeed something of a workaholic, from the number of enterprises he tried to get off the ground - he certainly seems to have been energetic and tireless (Mars) in his efforts in all kinds of directions.

Mercury in arty, Venus-ruled Libra is in harmonious sextile to Venus in showy Leo.

Opposing his natal Sun is expansive Jupiter, strong in its own sign of Pisces, and conjunct inventive Uranus (which though in the next sign, Aries, is still close enough to be termed conjoined). Here is the Uranus input I expected, and it's magnified by Jupiter. Right nextdoor is business-driven Saturn in its traditional rulership, mentally-driven Aquarius, lying in helpful sextile to its modern ruler, Uranus. Key here, I think, is the way Jupiter (expansion) and Uranus (innovation) link in to key elements of the chart - Sun and Moon.









Thursday, March 11, 2010

Astrologers' Words of Wisdom # 3

Words of Wisdom #3 consists of extracts from Thinking about Thinking by Jayj Jacobs. Since I first found this piece years ago, I go back to read it often. These are some of the wisest words I've found, and can be applied inside or outside astrology.


Here are some of my current thoughts about thinking. I invite you all to think about where and how they apply to recent conversations, to astrology in general, to (western/global) society as a whole, and to life as a process.

Bad thinking is bad for astrology. Bad thinking, or not thinking, is bad for everyone.

If one accepts anything without question s/he is not thinking.

If the premise is not grounded in factual or experiential reality the conclusions are meaningless. That's the classic GIGO: Garbage In, Garbage Out. Jacobs' GOGI Corollary is: If Garbage came Out, then Garbage went In.

If the precognitive mindset is impervious to contradictory input one is not thinking. That's prior opinions blinding one to reality.

If one thinks they know everything, and have nothing to learn, relearn or unlearn, then they have stopped thinking.

Knowledge can be divided into what you know, what you know you don't know, what you don't know you don't know, and what you know that just ain't so...............

Anything said about opinions can be validly said about beliefs.

Opinions are not facts. Opinions about facts are not facts. Opinions are not experiences. Opinions about experiences are not experiences.

Opinions, if not grounded in facts or experiences, are prejudices. That makes them bigoted preconceptions. 'Pre-conceptions' come before thinking has occurred; holding to them means one is not thinking.

Opinions and preconceptions are below stereotypes in a cognitive hierarchy. Stereotypes are pretty low, (and dangerous), but at least they are based in a grain of truth, since blown out of proportion.

Everyone has a right to their opinion. Having an opinion, even having the right to an opinion, does not make the opinion right.

No one is qualified, by reasons of knowledge & experience, to form an opinion about everything. Everyone faces something about which they are not qualified to form an opinion. Some are not qualified to form an opinion about anything. That stops very few people from forming an opinion.

It is bad thinking to credit the opinions of jerks, students, amateurs, the minimally competent, or anyone else, in the face of a contrary declaration by a virtuoso or a master -- in that field. It is also bad thinking to assume that only recognized experts have valid insights.

Confidence is unrelated to correctness. Certainty is not the same as accuracy.

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Facial Likeness

Facial features can be arranged on a human being in a limited number of ways, so it's surprising that we don't notice more look-alikes. Outside of family resemblances, which are to be expected, there aren't too many people with facial likenesses strong enough to confuse us. There are a few though - I came across an instance recently. We happened upon an episode of Boston Legal, when surfing TV channels. We couldn't decide whether one of the characters was being played by an actor we knew from Eureka. "He's broader", I kept trying to convince myself...."the Eureka guy is slimmer built....but....erm...he could have put on weight for the part".

Colin Ferguson who plays the sheriff in Eureka, and Mark Valley of Boston Legal and Human Target - and, I think, Fringe were the two who originally had me confused. As I was drafting this post about them and looking for photographs, I noticed another who could be added to this particular look-alike list: Joel Gretsch of The 4400

From the top: Colin, Mark, Colin, Mark, and Joel.







Astrologically, appearance is said to relate mainly to the rising sign - though I would guess that Sun and Moon signs, or any sign heavily emphasised or strongly placed on an angle, could also influence looks. I've personally come to recognise a limited number of astrology-related facial/physical features in people I've met. Gemini:wiry or skinny, bony face; Capricorn/Aquarius/Saturn: a definite look with regular features (hard to describe in words); Cancer: round face, tending towards chubbiness; and of course the famous magnetic Scorpio eyes, and the lustrous Leo hair.

Anyway, without times of birth, and therefore without knowing rising signs and Moon placement for the three guys mentioned, it's not possible conduct a proper investigation into whether astrology has any bearing on their facial likeness. Their birthdates are as follows:
Colin Ferguson - 22 July 1972, Montreal, Canada
Mark Valley - 24 December 1964 Ogdensburg, NY
Joel Gretsch - 20 December 1963, St. Cloud MN.

I've compared 12 noon charts for the three and can find only one point of (almost) convergence. This occurs in the few degrees at the end of Sagittarius and beginning of Capricorn, between 28 Sag and 2 Cap.: Colin Ferguson has Jupiter at 00 Capricorn, Mark Valley has Sun at 2 Capricorn and Joel Gretschen has Sun at 28 Sagittarius. If their rising signs were anywhere around that area it'd be amazing!

There's a non-astrological possibility for the likeness too, though I've no evidence to support it: Scottish ancestry. The look they share has a definite Scottish flavour.

Tuesday, March 09, 2010

War Movies ~ Hurt Locker ~ The Victors

So a movie about war won this year's Oscar for best film. Its director won the award for best director too - Ms Bigelow is the first female director to be so honored- that's definitely good news. Mystic Medusa wrote about Bigelow's astrology yesterday, so I won't bother to repeat it.

As for the movie - I haven't seen Hurt Locker yet, and am not sure I want to see it having read the synopsis and reviews. The idea of movie makers' bank accounts growing fat by depicting, as entertainment, our most current version of man's inhumanity to man makes me feel decidedly queasy. War movies depicting history are slightly more acceptable - as long as they don't glorify the horror of war in a juvenile gung-ho fashion.

The only movies with a war theme I've been able to stomach can be counted on one hand (and still have fingers left over): The Great Escape, From Here to Eternity, and the best and least lauded of all, Carl Foreman's The Victors.

It's ironic that a movie like Hurt Locker can win an Oscar in 2010, while, in the early 1960s The Victors was more or less blacklisted. It had certain sections cut out of it after preliminary screenings - sections never to be seen again......presumably because they were too anti-war, or "anti-American". I've noticed a few less than complimentary reviews still available on-line, written by then contemporary US film critics.

I saw the movie back in 1963, in England. I've never forgotten it. My husband had neither seen nor heard of it, so not long ago I went about trying to find a VHS or DVD recording of the movie. I found one, probably a bootleg, and the shortened version. Even in its less than ideal quality the film impressed my husband enough to be keen to find a recording of the full-length original somewhere. No luck so far.

It's inevitable that British and Europeans have different perspectives from Americans on World War 2, or had, in the 1960s, when it was still fresh in many memories. People in the USA have never had bombs raining down upon their cities, night after night. In what one sour critic described as "a mawkish scene" towards the end of the movie, when George Peppard's character is waiting for a 'bus in a northern English back street, in the rain, a kindly family invites him into their home to get dry and have a cup of tea (naturally!) Peppard chats with the family and asks a youngster about his Dad, who is away in the army. "What does your Dad say about the war", he asks. "He says he doesn't like it." A simple, unaffected, underplayed exchange, but it said so much.



Monday, March 08, 2010

Music Monday ~ Ry Cooder

Another Sun Pisces musician featured today: Ry Cooder. He's more "a musician's musician" than one widely known or remembered by the general public. I know him only from the Academy Award nominated film Buena Vista Social Club, which didn't really focus on Cooder, but on a group of Cuban musicians. Ry Cooder, though, is held in high regard by those in the musical know:


Cooder is a virtuoso on virtually every string instrument, from Mexican tiple to Middle Eastern saz to Hawaiian "slack key" guitar, but is mostly known for his country-blues-style mandolin, electric and acoustic guitar, and slide guitar..... one of the masters, an icon among session heroes. His solo explorations of the roots of rock and world music are extraordinary, resurrecting both known and obscure songs from country blues and Dust Bowl folk music, and mixing tropical calypso with Civil War camp songs, gospel, R&B, Tex Mex, and early rock 'n' roll classics. He even explored the roots of jazz, vaudeville, ragtime, and urban bop. Some of his finest recordings are movie scores for films including The Border and Paris, Texas. Today he is once again in the charts with the critically acclaimed album of Cuban music he produced, Buena Vista Social Club. Link.

An interview reported in the UK's The Observer newspaper reveals more of the real Ry Cooder than I found elsewhere. A couple of extracts:

Cooder doesn't like to dwell on the past, can be cranky, cantankerous even; on the walls, there is nothing to suggest that this is one of the most influential figures in the history of contemporary popular song. No old photographs posing with Captain Beefheart or the Rolling Stones (Cooder played on Let it Bleed, but fell into a dispute with Keith Richards, who confessed he took him 'for all that he knew', over ownership of the 'Honky Tonk Woman' riff); no gold discs commemorating his string of classic Seventies solo albums such as Chicken Skin Music; no framed guitar from the soundtrack sessions for the Wim Wenders movie Paris, Texas, the most feted of several film scores he wrote in the Eighties; nothing to mark his ground-breaking collaborations with Malian bluesman Ali Farka Toure or Hindustani musician VM Bhatt in the 1990s, never mind his work with Cuba's Buena Vista Social Club, whom he helped rediscover and produce. Put it to Cooder that he's nothing if not versatile and he says genially: 'Well, I'm sort of an osmotic fellow.' .......................................

.................It is no surprise that someone who thinks music took a wrong turn with the advent of the Beatles - just as his own story started - should place such value on a lifetime's knowledge. He talks fondly about the Buena Vista gang, describing his time with them as 'like going to school'. Cooder broke the Trading with the Enemy Act to record in Cuba and was prosecuted and fined $25,000. Only through an act of clemency invoked by President Clinton on his last day in office was he allowed back into the country with a one-year licence to carry out more recordings.

'Yeah, Clinton did good,' he says. 'But he also ushered in the era of Nafta, the North American Free Trade Area, which made Juarez, Mexico, the murder capital of the world, with women raped for their pay cheques. That was another nail in the coffin of workers' lives.'

Never mind the 'RepubliKlans' - the Democrats today are 'a bunch of cowards, chickenshit,' he says.

The antithesis of most rock stars, Cooder has always shunned the limelight and after the release of his Get Rhythm album in 1987, it had seemed he would never make a record under his own name again. 'That's the thing that surprises me about these two new albums,' says Nick Gold. 'Not that he made them, but that he's singing on them, exposing himself in that way.'


Born on 15 March 1947 in Los Angeles at 2.05 AM (Astrotheme).



It's not Sun, with Mercury conjunct Mars in Pisces that stood out for me when I first looked at Cooder's natal chart, it was Capricorn Moon in 12th house, which reflects his apparent dislike of celebrity and its trappings. 12th house has connection to Pisces, of course - last sign, last house in the chain. There's been a lot of twaddle written about 12th house, extrapolated from a) its position on the backside of the horizon, and b) its connection to Pisces/Neptune and all the delusional foggy dreaminess they represent. The explanation of 12th house that rings most true to me is that when emphasised by the presence of natal planets, the person will have, and need to keep, a very private side to their nature - working alone, being alone, is no problem to them. Perhaps, had Ry Cooder been born at a different time of day, his name would have been much better known by the public in general, perhaps then he'd have wanted it that way - as it was, he didn't!

A Grand Trine in Air linking Venus in Aquarius, Uranus in Gemini and Neptune in Libra provides a harmonious circuit of the mentally-oriented signs, representing quick wit, social concern, and artistic talent.

Another, looser Grand Trine links Sun, Jupiter and Saturn. I like the trine from Sun (self) to Jupiter for Ry Cooder. Jupiter represents expansion and travel, foreign countries....he seems forever drawn to explore the music of other cultures and nations, doesn't he? This might seem to be in conflict with his withdrawn 12th house Moon, but while physically travelling, Cooder does seems to retain an inner (Moon) sense of personal privacy.

Cooder's Pisces-Capricorn blend is a rather good one for a musician, it allows his creativity full-rein while keeping his feet firmly on the ground.



Paris, Texas.


Going back to Okinawa


Sunday, March 07, 2010

Rahm Rumor

There's a rumor around that President Obama's Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel may be "on the way out". Internet or any other rumors are, more often than not, fabrications, but still, they provide food for thought and grist for t'mill. I rather wish the President would take Michael Moore up on his recent offer (see here) to take Mr. Emanuel's place!

I can find no time of birth for Rahm Emanuel but the 12 noon chart below will suffice to investigate possibilities of a move in the near future.




Transiting Pluto will be close to his natal Saturn towards the end of this year - from Fall onward. That could well indicate some kind of transformation in his professional life (represented by Saturn).
Interestingly, back in the summer of 2008, during the run-up to the General Election, transiting Saturn was close to his natal Pluto - so the upcoming transit is a reversal of sorts. Hmmm. Food for thought indeed!

We shall see!

Saturday, March 06, 2010

Another US Radical ~ Saul Alinsky

Some writers and commentators who lean right-ward politically used to offer it as A Bad Thing that President Obama (and Hillary Clinton) were once inspired and influenced by the views and writings of Saul Alinsky. From what I've gleaned about Mr Alinsky's views, I see it as a great pity that Clinton and Obama weren't even more deeply influenced by them than now appears to be the case.

When I read and post about US radicals of yesteryear: John Reed, Abbie Hoffman and Alinsky, I'm inwardly yelling, "Where are their counterparts now, when this country, soured by the greed of corporations, badly in need of a fresh direction, needs 'em?"


From Who2Biographies
Tough, pragmatic and a lover of humanity, Saul Alinsky pioneered a method of helping poor and working-class people organize themselves to improve their communities. Combining urban social theories he had learned at the University of Chicago with street smarts he had earned growing up in that city's Jewish ghetto, Alinsky first worked in prisons and as a juvenile delinquency researcher. Then, starting in crime-ridden Chicago neighborhoods in the late 1930s, he helped unions, churches and other social groups unite and win everything from jobs to streetlights and garbage collection. He would immerse himself in the neighborhood, listen to ordinary people's troubles and needs, assess where power lay, and empower previously divided groups to seek common goals by standing up to government and corporate machines. With financial backing from department-store heir Marshall Field III, he established the Industrial Areas Foundation, which helped him extend his work to several U.S. cities. He had little patience for militants, Communists or dreamy liberals, saying he was a community organizer because he believed in American democracy and because "I can't stand to see people pushed around."

Ironically - very ironically - factions on the far right of US politics now seem to have started following Alinsky's Rules for Radicals themselves in organising their so-called Tea Party movement. ("Can the Right Imitate Saul Alinsky?")

I'm interested to look at Saul Alinsky's natal chart. He was born in Chicago on 30 January 1909. I can find no time of birth for him so a 12 noon chart has to suffice. Rising sign and Moon degree will not be accurate.



Woweee! Now here's a chart that fits like a glove! Sun and Mercury in intellectually-driven Aquarius; but more significant is rebellious, revolutionary Uranus tightly conjunct Venus, in pragmatic Capricorn.

Natal Sun sextiles business-like Saturn in go-getting Aries on one side and energetic Mars in expansive Sagittarius on the other.

Unless born in the very first minutes of 30 January Moon would have been in communicative Gemini, somewhere between 1 and 12 degrees, and quite likely in harmonious trine to his Aquarius Sun.

I'd say that little lot is a recipe for exactly what manifested in Saul Alinsky.

Friday, March 05, 2010

Arty Farty Friday ~ Lord Snowdon, photographer


Time to feature another photographer - one with Sun in Pisces and an interesting backstory would be good. How about Anthony Armstrong Jones aka Lord Snowdon, once husband of the late Princess Margaret of the UK? It'll be his birthday on Sunday.
(Below: Meeting the Beatles in 1965)








If we can believe all we read (highly questionable) Lord Snowdon could easily compete with Tiger Woods in the amorous encounters department - before, during and after his various marriages. That's not the area with which I need to focus my attention though, in an arty farty post his photography must take pride of place.

A few quotes about his work (for links see end of post):
Lord Snowdon.... is a master of illusion. His work incorporates elements that can defy reality yet also convey the essence of a subject. An area of particular focus has been portraiture, which has allowed Snowdon to photograph a range of people spanning the great to the ordinary. Snowdon strives to capture a unique aspect from his portrait subjects and will research their background in order to achieve his goal.

A studio shoot with Lord Snowdon is quite often an uncomfortable experience. He has an uncanny ability to see through even the toughest facades, to strip pretensions, and by removing whatever pride his sitters arrive with, reveal the truth. Although famous for his charm and perfect manners, he likes to unnerve. This approach, coupled with his instinct to press the shutter at exactly the right moment, has made him a world famous photographer.

Despite this well-honed, well-known technique he has no recognisable photographic style, and indeed for the last half-century has made efforts to avoid developing one. He feels that as a photographer his role is to become an invisible observer, coaxing the truth out of his subjects without turning the result into a ‘Snowdon’.

In 1962 .... he embarked on a series of touching pictures examining old age, finally published in 1965, the first of a number of commissions that dealt with social issues. He photographed a fourteen page article on British theatre in 1966 that coined the phrase ‘swinging London’, and he travelled to India, Japan and Italy for the magazine at various points during the decade..... From 1960 to 1965 he was commissioned to design a new aviary for London Zoo. The project, now a grade II listed building, took five years to complete and remains one of Snowdon’s proudest achievements. He won two Emmys for a television documentary, Don’t Count the Candles in 1968, and was also made responsible for the overall design of the investiture of the Prince of Wales in 1969.

By 1970 he was back working for Vogue, back working at the level of intensity that suited his drive, and was one of the most in-demand photographers in the country. His output from the decade is huge; he made six television documentaries, published seven books of his own work, held exhibitions in Cologne, London, the Far East, and Australia, whilst all the time contributing to the publications he helped define. This tireless attitude to work has continued to the present day.
He has published four books since turning seventy, still travels extensively, and refuses point-blank to bask in the indelible reputation that he has worked hard at since 1952.

Lord Snowdon obviously has art in his blood. His great-grandfather was the Punch cartoonist and photographer Linley Sambourne (1845-1910), and his uncle was the legendary theatre, ballet and opera designer Oliver Messel (1904-1978).



With Neptune (the creative/photography planet) smack-dab on the descendant angle, one of the most potent points in the zodiac circle, it'd be very strange to find the chart belonged to someone not creative in one way or another. Sun, and Venus (planet of the arts) are conjoined in Neptune's rulership, Pisces, and lie in semi-sextile to another pair of personal planets: Mercury/Mars conjoined nextdoor in Aquarius, adding an energetically intellectual flavour to Lord Snowdon's nature. Pisces rising puts yet another layer of emphasis on his Neptunian traits. Moon and Jupiter in Gemini - another pair of conjoined personal planets reflect his outgoing, sociable and versatile side, and are in sextile to Uranus in Aries, bringing in a touch of the unexpected; maybe this is more relevant to his private life and reputedly bohemian choice of lifestyle, rather than to his art.





Sources: Google Image and
http://www.faqs.org/abstracts/Publishing-industry/The-magic-of-Lord-Snowdon-The-imagery-and-the-irony.html

http://www.chrisbeetles.com/gallery/artist.php?art=2871


From VOGUE


PRINCESS MARGARET in the BATH


PRINCESS MARGARET




PETER SELLERS & BRIT EKLAND





DALI



Queen Elizabeth, Prince Philip, Prince Charles & Princess Anne




PRINCESS MARGARET



IN A MENTAL HOSPITAL



HELEN MIRREN



PRINCESS DIANA



RUDOLPH NURYEV







CLINT EASTWOOD



JACK NICHOLSON


Thursday, March 04, 2010

Fixed Stars & John Frawley.

At Real Astrology website there's an excerpt from astrologer John Frawley's next book, due for publication this spring. He writes, in the excerpt, about Fixed Stars and how they came to have the meanings astrologers now accept. I found it a clear and fairly rational assessment, but was still left with a big question. As usual!

Mr Frawley theorises that the "pictures" said to be formed by the stars and constellations are helpfully symbolic, devised by ancients who understood the stars' intrinsic natures. He surmises that the stars' natures were not discovered empirically - i.e. by observation and experiment, but writes that:"Our astrologer forebears understood the nature of individual stars."

But how? How?

In spite of that frustrating question, the excerpt is a good read. The answer to my question might be revealed elsewhere in his book.

I was curious to take a peek at Mr. Frawley's own astrology. He has Sun in Taurus, Moon in Pisces and Capricorn rising. Hmmmm - quite surprising I thought - until I noticed from the Astrodatabank chart that his natal Moon falls in the 6th degree of Pisces which is on, or very close to, Fixed Star Deneb Adige, thought to have association with astrology. As it happens, my natal Jupiter, at 6.03 Pisces is close to that star too.

There's an interesting interview with John Frawley, by Garry Phillipson at Skyscript - HERE.
With regard to his natal chart he had this to say:

Q: Would you be willing to reveal your birth data?
16th May 1955, at twenty to one in the morning BST, in London.

Q: Could you home in on one or two factors in your chart which explain why you've been attracted towards the path in astrology which you have taken?
Yes, I would say a very strong Saturn: Capricorn rising; Saturn on the MC. Saturn, obviously, gives a respect for tradition; an awareness that you can't just make it up for yourself, or take it from someone who thinks they just have, and a willingness to accept the discipline of learning how to do it properly, rather than adopting the popular attitude of "it doesn't work for me, so I'll dream up my own method".

This Saturn influence makes it comparatively easy to get the focus I spoke of above: one doesn't expect to please, so one can go rather more easily for what the chart shows to be true.

Wednesday, March 03, 2010

Astrologers' Words of Wisdom #2

Astrologers come in all shades, stripes, shapes and sizes. Something for everyone! My own choice is for the more down-to-earth variety, those who never lose sight of reason and rationality. There are, and have been, quite a few such astrologers. As an occasional feature I'll aim to choose a paragraph or so from the books or websites of some of these. Second helping coming up:

From astrologer Lee Lehman's Astro Blog, towards the end of a post titled "Critical Method in Astrology":
I would like to propose a working axiom that would make almost everybody's astrological learning curve easier. It's very simple: perhaps astrology doesn't have to explain everything. Consider how this simple idea can free you up phenomenally.

Consider, for examples, how geneticists don't feel they have to explain all of intelligence. If a person seems to be brighter or dimmer than might be expected, geneticists don't have to run out and try to find some other genetics analysis to try to explain it: they can simply say: there must be an environmental effect. A meteorologist doesn't have to go to a conference to find a new technique when a forecast is wrong: he or she simply says: either there must be a factor I didn't take into account, or perhaps my weightings were wrong - or even that my forecast was only statistical to begin with!

What we collectively do which other knowledge areas don't is to create a tent big enough to capture all possible outcomes - no matter how unlikely. We never stop to think that the odd case may simply be better explained by something other than astrology. Instead, we risk sacrificing what accuracy we have by focusing too much on the out-liers: those one-in-a-million shots that may be real - just not likely. We don't stop to consider that the astrology that can deal with the oddballs may be embarrassingly bad on the routine.
My own thoughts: "a tent big enough to capture all possible outcomes - no matter how unlikely." This is what worries me. It's possible to make any chart or aspect mean anything if you dig deeply enough, and use a number of different astrological "tools". The less "tools" the better, is my choice. If things don't seem to work out, then, as Ms Lehman says, there are numerous other ingredients affecting human beings, individually and collectively.

Astrology works - I'm certain of it - but I doubt that it works reliably to the extent that some would like to think, nor on as many levels. That's my own view, formed from personal experience. It's obviously one not held by most astrologers.

Tuesday, March 02, 2010

Idol's Best Hopefuls

As the astrology bloggers' friendly neighbourhood American Idol fan, I ought to report now and again on the progress of this season's Idol bandwagon.

Contestants have now been winnowed to 10 females and 10 males, two of each to be eliminated after viewers' votes following tonight's and tomorrow night's shows. Results will be reported on a show on Thursday evening. Phew! Another Idol marathon, like last week's coming up.

I took a look at the ephemeris to compare this season's outer planetary positions with those of this time last year. Uranus and Neptune are still in semi-sextile and mutual reception (in each other's rulerships), and in even tighter semi-sextile than they were last year. Saturn is retrograding back into Virgo, where it was for last season - so the "atmosphere" planet-wise is much the same. Creative and unexpected performances will go down well (Uranus/Neptune) but there could later be backlash against any who are not what the viewers and producers consider to be "squeaky clean" (Saturn in Virgo).

I've yet to find any birth dates of contestants. In the absence of being able to predict progress on the basis of natal charts I visited a betting website OLBG Sports to investigate their views.

As it happens their top three are mine too - though in a different order.

They report:

Andrew Garcia can be backed at 4/1. A young dad from Southern California, sports big neck tattoo and heavy specs; already well-known as a singer in his own locality and on YouTube. Seems to have the ability to re-work established arrangements and present fresh versions of songs.








Casey James at 7/1. Singer-songwriter type from Texas, nice looking with a natural charm about him. Some journalists parrot the term "cougar bait" - very annoying, both for him (I'm sure) and for viewers with a smidgen of discernment. The situation wasn't helped by silly judge Kara going all girly and ga-ga over him during auditions. Thank goodness for Ellen DeGeneres!







Crystal Bowersox at 7/1. Single mum currently from Chicago but a former country girl from Ohio, she sports blonde dreadlocks, plays acoustic guitar, can sound Joplinesque. Definitely different from the average female Idol contestant.



I'd venture to rank Casey James above Andrew Garcia. Casey is the one I'll be waiting to hear each week - in the way I waited to hear Adam Lambert last season. Casey has an extra "something", as well as being a seasoned performer, and professional musician. He has a rather colorful past, it seems. I do hope the strait-laced brigade don't come out in force against him. Apparently some 9 years ago he spent time in jail for driving offences. These were misdemeanors, not crimes. While not admirable in any way, they are long past. He hasn't offended since, and back then he paid his dues.

Andrew Garcia is a gifted singer, no doubt about it. He'll be in the last half dozen for sure. Crystal Bowersox is the least "plastic" of the 10 gals, a "real" performer, no glamor-puss but natural and hugely talented.