Showing posts with label art films. Show all posts
Showing posts with label art films. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 11, 2017

An "art film" I actually understood...I think

At the weekend we watched, via Netflix, an "indie" movie titled Paterson, directed by arty farty specialist Jim Jarmusch. I'm not a big art film fan generally, haven't seen any other of Mr Jarmisch's offerings. Paterson, for the first 15 minutes or so was under threat of the big switchoff - by me. Husband is more of an art film fan, but even he had early doubts about this one. We persisted though, and I'm happy that we did.

Although I know not of Jim Jarmusch's work, I do know of Doctor William Carlos Williams and his poetry, which forms a kind of under-pinning of this film. When the film drew to its close I realised, and commented, that it was, in itself just like a William Carlos Williams poem. The ordinary, the undramatic, a celebration of everyday things: their everyday-ness evoking, eventually, something more than ordinary.

Bare-bones of the movie = a New Jersey bus driver called Paterson, in a New Jersey town called Paterson; his creative, slightly ditzy stay-at-home wife, and their English bulldog called Marvin. Marvin is the only one in the film exhibiting any sense of humour - with a name like "Marvin", as a bulldog, you'd have to, wouldn't you? The bus-driver is also a secret poet who writes his poems in an old fashioned notebook, during his breaks, and later at home, in his den in the cellar. He's a fan of William Carlos Williams, who had been a doctor practising in and around Paterson, the town.

Deeper into the movie's flesh and organs there are signs and symbols, things to be noticed : twins turn up frequently in the background, different sets, sometimes in the foreground too. Paterson's wife Laura's arty creations are always in black and white, repetitive and often circular in shape, repeating, repeating, like the bus driver's workday routines, Monday to Friday. Even Laura's cupcakes, baked for the farmer's market, are strangely repetitive, also decorated in black and white icing. Paterson does not carry a smartphone, own a laptop or computer; his favourite neighbourhood pub, where he drinks just one beer each evening, does not have a TV. Paterson lives in the world of Paterson, in his head and in his notebook.

Does anything exciting or interesting happen in this film? We waited for some kind of climax, and there came a couple of low-key events, but these proved even more low-key because of Paterson's own attitude to them. There was, though, a single event, involving Marvin. Marvin, by the way, does not get killed off for drama's sake in this movie, as dogs are wont to do in many movies. The Marvin event, for a while, shakes Paterson to his core, but a rather mystical, healing event follows.

Not everyone will appreciate Paterson, the movie. For viewers weaned on super-hero, slam-bammers, raunchy language, and soft-porn-ish scenes punctuating films, Paterson will seem like an anachronism and a complete waste of almost 2 hours. For anyone who enjoys the William Carlos Williams style of poetry, I suspect they would adore this film. I enjoyed it - didn't exactly adore it, but did appreciate what it was about, what it was doing.

There are a couple of my archived posts, from 2011 and 2015, about William Carlos Williams, including some astrology, HERE and HERE.

In closing this post, I cannot resist quoting a few lines from one of Williams' poems, The Forgotten City, where he recalled a "curious and industrious" working-class neighbourhood, he had driven through after a storm, and wrote:

.....I had no idea where I was and promised myself
I would some day go back to study this
curious and industrious people who lived
in these apartments, at these sharp
corners and turns of intersecting avenues
with so little apparent communication
with an outside world. How did they get
cut off this way from representation in our
newspapers and other means of publicity
when so near the metropolis, so closely
surrounded by the familiar and the famous?

Yes, how did they...the working class? Words as relevant today as on that day long ago when Doctor Williams drove through those streets and found inspiration for his poem.


Thursday, February 23, 2012

Pisces x 3 ~ Pier Paolo Pasolini

Scooting around YouTube one day I happened upon Farmer in the City from Scott Walker's 1995 album Tilt. I listened.... listened again, and again..... throughout the day and next day. It's weird but addictive, and beautifully rendered by Scott Walker.

Being a curious so-and-so I wanted to know what the song was all about. It wasn't difficult to find out, especially as the song is sub-titled Remembering Pasolini. It is a tribute to Pier Paolo Pasolini, whose name I'd heard, in connection with movies, but without knowing anything about him.

I discovered that he had Sun, Venus and Uranus in Pisces - so, with Sun, Mercury, Moon and Neptune in Pisces as I type, and remembering that Neptune and Pisces connect to film, now would be a good time for a post about him.

Astrodatabank and Wikipedia help with detail:

Wikipedia:
A few of the lyrics (of Farmer in the city) are appropriated from Norman Macafee's English translation of Pier Paolo Pasolini's poem, "Uno dei Tanti Epiloghi" ("One of the Many Epilogs"), which was written in 1969 for Pasolini's friend and protégé, the scruffy young nonprofessional actor, Ninetto Davoli. Throughout the song, Walker's chant of "Do I hear 21, 21, 21...? I'll give you 21, 21, 21...", may be a reference to Davoli's age when he was drafted into (and subsequently deserted from) the Italian army.


Astrodatabank
On Pasolini: "Italian actor and director of radical films, best known for controversial films about people in conflict with the mainstream society. A virtual Renaissance man who was "poet, novelist, scholar, film critic and theorist, reforming zealot and creator of large scaled visual spectaculars," he wrote and produced "Boys," and "Sebastian." Poetic and literate, a Marxist yet bourgeois in his efforts to be socially correct, he died under circumstances as perverted as those seen in some of his films. ..............His unorthodox views led to his arrest in 1962 on charges of insulting the church in his film "Rogopag." He clashed frequently with Italian authorities over the content of his films, which held liberal doses of sex, violence and blasphemy, at times being declared obscene...... His own death could have been scripted into one of his features. Pasolini was bludgeoned to death by a 17-year-old youth who claimed that he had made homosexual advances, 11/01/1975, 11:30 PM, Civitavecchia, Italy. The boy then ran him over (several times) with Pasolini's own Alfa Romeo."

With data from Astrodatabank, Pasolini's natal chart:



Astrological indications of Pasolini's non-conformist ways are not hard to find. Eccentric Uranus on the ascendant is a classic sign. In Pasolini's case Uranus conjoins his natal Sun to. Double whammy - in imaginative and potentially addictive Pisces, ruled by Neptune! Mercury, the communcations planet, is in Aquarius - sign of Uranus' rulership, which adds another layer of avant garde non-conformism. This guy was what used to be known as an "enfant terrible"!

Pluto (darkness, death, intensity) in Cancer is in harmonious trine to his ascending degree and those first-house Pisces planets....here's source of the dark side of his eccentricities - and what likely is a reflection of the dreadful manner of his death.

I took a look at the chart for the date of his murder, 1 November 1975 and noted that Pluto then lay at 10 degrees of Libra - exactly conjoining Pasolini's North Node of the Moon, also conjunct Saturn and Jupiter which lay on either side of the node.

It's not too surprising that Scott Walker felt drawn to sing about Pasolini. Walker's chart is shown in the post for Monday 9 January. There's some common emphasis. Both men have Mercury in Aquarius (10 degrees apart), both have Mars in Sagittarius (10 degrees apart). Walker's Moon and midheaven conjoin Pasolini's Uranus/Sun/Venus cluster in Pisces.


Friday, August 06, 2010

Arty Farty Film Makers ~ Bergman, Fellini, Kurosawa.

"If I said Bergman, Fellini, Kurosawa, what would first come to mind?" I asked my husband.

His response, "Art films".

"Good! I thought you might say foreign films. Arty Farty film makers this Friday then!"


Definition of an art film: a cinematic film intended to be an artistic work rather than a commercial film having mass appeal. I'm as far from an expert on art films as you can get. I'll wander art galleries filled with abstract, surrealist and modern art in general, and enjoy the experience, but sit me down with an art film and I'll be restless and complaining about pretention, elitism and experiencing boredom within the first 20 minutes. I can still investigate the astrology of three of the biggest names in the art film genre though. Their natal charts are shown together below, for easier comparison.

The three guys I named were all foreign to the USA, and the UK, as it happens.
Art films were the speciality of foreign directors back in the 1950s and 60s. Not many of these filtered through to the town where I grew up. Censorship prevented wide circulation of the movies in the UK, early on. In the USA anything vaguely "furrin" was encountered with paranoia, suspicions that it may reek of, and spread, communism or at least "pinko" sentiments. I do recall seeing a French movie La Ronde in my early teens, before I was supposed to be allowed in to an "X" rated film. I'm not sure whether this could be classed as an art film or not -but I wasn't impressed either way.

So then: Bergman, Fellini and Kurosawa. In alphabetical order, with minimal biographical notes, and links to further bio and filmography. I shall try to spot any differences in style or focus before looking at the natal charts.

Ingmar Bergman, born in Sweden, son of a strict Lutheran minister. His movies deal with relationships, psychological conflict, pain, death, spirituality. He uses facial close-ups a lot. For Bergman, focus on face, or hand allows the camera to reveal the inner aspects of human emotion. In his autobiography, Bergman claimed that he was always trying to generate his mother's face .
"No form of art goes beyond ordinary consciousness as film does, straight to our emotions, deep into the twilight room of the soul." Ingmar Bergman
Link to Bergman at Internet Movie Database





Federico Fellini born in Rimini, Italy. His movies center on his life experiences, the women who both attracted and frightened him, and on an Italy dominated in his youth by Mussolini and Pope Pius XII. Fellini started recording his ideas and dreams in notebooks in the 1960s. Life and dreams were raw material for his films. From my limited experience in this genre I'd say that Fellini's movies are lighter and brighter than Bergman's - more whacky too, more outlandishly artistic than sensitively so.

"Everyone lives in his own fantasy world, but most people don't understand that. No one perceives the real world. Each person simply call his private, personal fantasies the Truth. The difference is that I know I live in a fantasy world. I prefer it that way and resent anything that disturbs my vision." (Fellini in I, Fellini, ed. by Charlotte Chandler, 1995)
Fellini at IMDb





Akira Kurosawa was born in Tokyo, seventh child of a strict soldier-father. His early loves were oil painting and literature, including the Western writing, influential in Japan. These interests became important throughout his film career. The painter's eye is obvious in his films, especially in the sumptuous later ones. Kurosawa adapted film plots from Shakespeare, Dostoevsky and detective writer Ed McBain. He stumbled into the movie business as a young assistant director and scenario writer, directing his first film at age 33. Kurosawa's style would fit somewhere between Bergman's seriously depressing introversion, and Fellini's eccentric and colorful visions. Hauntingly beautiful presentation, rather than introversion, shock value or eccentricity is his focus.

"People today have forgotten they're really just a part of nature. Yet, they destroy the nature on which our lives depend. They always think they can make something better. Especially scientists. They may be smart, but most don't understand the heart of nature. They only invent things that, in the end, make people unhappy. Yet they're so proud of their inventions. What's worse, most people are, too. They view them as if they were miracles. They worship them. They don't know it, but they're losing nature. They don't see that they're going to perish. The most important things for human beings are clean air and clean water."— Akira Kurosawa
Kurosawa at IMDb



Natal charts with data from Astrodatabank follow, click on them to enlarge. What ought to stand out is an emphasis on Neptune, said to rule photography and film. Also a strong arty Venus, possibly eccentric Uranus in Fellini's case. Let's see:

BERGMAN: If time of birth is accurate, Neptune conjunct Mercury and Saturn lies at midheaven - one of the strongest points in a natal chart. Venus sextiles this cluster from Gemini. Moon in Libra, sign ruled by Venus also sextiles Neptune.



FELLINI: Neptune conjunct Jupiter in Leo = planet of film & creativity blended with planet of exaggeration and publication! Venus (art) in Sagittarius lay in harmonious trine to these planets. Sun and Uranus form a semi-sextile at 29 degrees of Capricorn and Aquarius, blending the business sense of Capricorn with the eccentricity of Uranus.



KUROSAWA: If 12 noon time of birth is correct (I guess someobody has to be born at noon) Neptune lay very close to the ascendant degree - the strongest point in the natal chart. Other than that, there's not as much of significance here as in the other 2 charts. A T-square links an opposition from Neptune to Uranus with squares to Saturn = film/creativity, avant garde and work or business connected in a challenging way. This could reflect difficulties encountered in his homeland, where he was not originally as well appreciated as he is in the West. His experimental (Uranus) work may have been before its time for Japan.