tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post4622024476447724672..comments2024-03-17T03:42:21.277-05:00Comments on LEARNING CURVE ON THE ECLIPTIC: AQUARIUS PRO & CON (Progressive & Conservative)Twilighthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14138621610593773784noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post-23001191824994541902010-10-03T08:52:07.862-05:002010-10-03T08:52:07.862-05:00anthonynorth ~~~ For some Sun Aquarius people it d...anthonynorth ~~~ For some Sun Aquarius people it does look that way, AN. However, I do know some who are not at all inclined in that direction. Eg. A cousin, born 3 days before me, and a best friend of my youth born a week after me - neither has, or has ever had, the slightest inclination to "pour waters", as far as I know.<br /><br />It's a mystery. I think background and experiences we meet along life's highway have a lot to do with whether our astrological potential emerges or reamains dormant. It was my late partner who "awakened" my own interest in politics. Without his input I might now be as disinterested as my cousin and my friend.Twilighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14138621610593773784noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post-64774743623821807452010-10-03T08:46:26.331-05:002010-10-03T08:46:26.331-05:00WWW ~~~ Yes, wouldn't that be one step forward...WWW ~~~ Yes, wouldn't that be one step forward for astrology? Even a negative outcome - ie. that there is no apparent common factor, would tell us something. ;-)<br /><br />Next president and VP: Lipstick and Dipstick? We should be polishing up our pitchforks and torches right now!Twilighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14138621610593773784noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post-77741233834367653082010-10-03T03:06:39.874-05:002010-10-03T03:06:39.874-05:00My Dearest is Aquarian. I suppose if there's a...My Dearest is Aquarian. I suppose if there's a common denominator, it is to try to do something for others, taking their own mind-set into the world.anthonynorthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06680944720744601697noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post-87642893014092621012010-10-02T21:55:35.120-05:002010-10-02T21:55:35.120-05:00I think what would be very interesting would be to...I think what would be very interesting would be to round up a lot of people born in the same couple of days in 1964 and see what kind of people they are....<br />Something was certainly rotting in Denmark round that time....<br />XO<br />WWW<br />Next president and veep?Wisewebwomanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15281689872840844191noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post-38949536246572810362010-10-02T14:55:55.107-05:002010-10-02T14:55:55.107-05:00Shannon ~~~ Hi there!
Yes, true - some seem more ...Shannon ~~~ Hi there!<br /><br />Yes, true - some seem more nightmare-like than visions to this observer. ;-)<br /><br />The co-ruler factor does seem like a good fit. How one ruler gains precedence though is something I'll have to investigate/test sometime. <br /><br />Nice blog you have there by the way (Signs of Potential) - I'll add it to my link list. :-)Twilighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14138621610593773784noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post-88890376448369530112010-10-02T12:40:01.710-05:002010-10-02T12:40:01.710-05:00They're all visionaries, in their own way... i...They're all visionaries, in their own way... it's the visions that wildly differ.<br /><br />I think you're right, the co-ruler situation leads to a lot of paradoxes.Shannonhttp://signsofpotential.comnoreply@blogger.com