tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post3170008061651211687..comments2024-03-17T03:42:21.277-05:00Comments on LEARNING CURVE ON THE ECLIPTIC: The Debatable DebateTwilighthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14138621610593773784noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post-10961498098472964582012-10-07T11:25:44.259-05:002012-10-07T11:25:44.259-05:00mike ~~ I'm not surprised the fact checkers fo...mike ~~ I'm not surprised the fact checkers found lots of non-facts among Romney's responses. He's a natural salesman, whereas Obama is a natural lecturer, when unaided by teleprompter prompts, that is - from his scriptwriters (who are also salesmen). Neither is a natural leader, in my opinion.Twilighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14138621610593773784noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post-13642875114890863932012-10-07T10:46:14.974-05:002012-10-07T10:46:14.974-05:00I watched the debates, but can't say I learned...I watched the debates, but can't say I learned anything new, including the Republican mantra "we don't need fact-checkers running the campaign". I already know Obama from his job performance, so I had hoped to gain additional insight to Romney and I was amused that most of the math Romney presented was disputed by the fact-checkers. I've never liked politicians that employ mathmagic. Obama scored much higher with the fact-checkers.mikenoreply@blogger.com