tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post8236762428269540996..comments2024-03-17T03:42:21.277-05:00Comments on LEARNING CURVE ON THE ECLIPTIC: 1927....2013Twilighthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14138621610593773784noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post-81220990775536508142013-10-16T08:45:48.648-05:002013-10-16T08:45:48.648-05:00ex-Chomp ~ Dominance was gradual, let us hope the ...ex-Chomp ~ Dominance was gradual, let us hope the exit from dominance will be equally gradual and not nearly as painful as some suspect.<br /><br />Yes, put another way the USA is "a fool to itself"...its own best (or worst) enemy. :-(<br />Twilighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14138621610593773784noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post-69870559863110087082013-10-16T04:37:58.133-05:002013-10-16T04:37:58.133-05:00There is truth in this comparison. The times of Us...There is truth in this comparison. The times of Usa dominance are going to an end, but it is making much more harm the inner neoliberist fanaticist agenda and the pseudoliberty maniacs than the whole terrorism. <br /><br />Usa are their best enemies. <br />ex-Chompnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post-39712562154907991692013-10-15T15:52:24.486-05:002013-10-15T15:52:24.486-05:00Juno ~ Ah! :-) I didn't mean a complete exit, ...Juno ~ Ah! :-) I didn't mean a complete exit, just an exit from its "heyday" period. <br /><br />We could both be right, then. Though I doubt any kind of transition made could ever reinstate USA to its former "glories", by the time completed too many other candidates, waiting for their own heydays, would be nipping at US heels.<br /><br />I agree, change, eventually for the better, <b>is</b> gonna come, probably around 2025, maybe even a bit before. Twilighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14138621610593773784noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post-4848999089450624532013-10-15T15:34:58.810-05:002013-10-15T15:34:58.810-05:00Hi Twilight,
I don't think the U.S is at an e...Hi Twilight,<br /><br />I don't think the U.S is at an exit stage, but going through a MAJOR transition with the old guard resisting every step of the way. It will be rocky for years to come with the changes Pluto in Capricorn brings. Maybe I am too optimistic. In any event, it is not so fun to live through these changes, though. Nothing seems stable. Junohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08257525915245560613noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post-75524193889912552582013-10-15T11:19:24.928-05:002013-10-15T11:19:24.928-05:00mike ~ Ms Mallick's proposition could be wrong...mike ~ Ms Mallick's proposition could be wrong, of course - just her theory and opinion. It's not fully upheld by astrology - my conclusion. I prefer my "entrance and exit" version, also not upheld. :-)<br /><br />There's Neptune though, and 2008 - well-spotted, mike! <br /><br />I like the 2 July Armistead chart for the USA (but that's just me).<br />US Moon in that one is conjunct Pluto at 25 Capricorn (Pluto at 27). Neptune 22 Virgo.Twilighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14138621610593773784noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post-18878617092475249602013-10-15T10:39:37.038-05:002013-10-15T10:39:37.038-05:00This is a bit tough to call, Twilight. The 1927 c...This is a bit tough to call, Twilight. The 1927 comparison states the stock market in its high...that would have to compare to the summer of 2008, just prior to the housing and financial bubbles' collapse.<br /><br />The correlation I detect is Neptune @ 24 Aquarius 2008 vs Neptune @ 24 Leo 1927...Neptune opposition Neptune.<br /><br />Using the USA's natal date-time of July 4, 1776, between noon and 4 PM, would put Neptune on (2008) or opposing (1927) the USA's natal moon. Depends on the USA's natal chart, which I think you have a different date...don't have time right now to go through your archive.mikenoreply@blogger.com