tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post7201492489254804508..comments2024-03-17T03:42:21.277-05:00Comments on LEARNING CURVE ON THE ECLIPTIC: Astro-Vintage 1902Twilighthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14138621610593773784noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post-67606606227121044552011-07-22T08:34:34.166-05:002011-07-22T08:34:34.166-05:00anyjazz ~~~ Ta! I think it shows that "some...anyjazz ~~~ Ta! I think it shows that "something is happening, but we don't know what it is, do we Mr........?" ;-)Twilighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14138621610593773784noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post-81567271547072138682011-07-21T17:10:48.723-05:002011-07-21T17:10:48.723-05:00Kind of hard to ignore, isn't it?
GOod post!Kind of hard to ignore, isn't it?<br /><br />GOod post!anyjazzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03319237414264543250noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post-7261011936959001402011-07-21T10:38:46.826-05:002011-07-21T10:38:46.826-05:00James ~~ Yes - thereby hangs quite a tale I guess....James ~~ Yes - thereby hangs quite a tale I guess. A quick search brought up:<br /><br />" However, in 1902, the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that although Thomas Edison had patented the Kinetograph, he only owned rights to the sprocket system that moved perforated film through the camera, not the entire concept of the movie camera"Twilighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14138621610593773784noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post-67937404683231372262011-07-21T10:12:34.345-05:002011-07-21T10:12:34.345-05:00Mar 10th - A United States court of appeals rules ...Mar 10th - A United States court of appeals rules that Thomas Edison did not invent the movie camera.<br /><br />That's an interesting one.James Highamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14525082702330365464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post-27917503831358481012011-07-21T10:10:16.916-05:002011-07-21T10:10:16.916-05:00Anonymous/Gian Paul ~~ Thanks. :-)
Yes, I agree. ...Anonymous/Gian Paul ~~ Thanks. :-)<br /><br />Yes, I agree. If we "back-off" and look at sets or groups of events from a greater time distance, another version of the same kind of patterning emerges.Twilighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14138621610593773784noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16659850.post-82814814623831692462011-07-21T09:54:10.336-05:002011-07-21T09:54:10.336-05:00Very interesting post,T. What you say about given ...Very interesting post,T. What you say about given years is equally true for given centuries: 15 - the Renaissance, 17 - human liberties and the beginning of modern times.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com